
Modern web development constantly balances visual polish with performance. I’m writing this because many teams only notice CSS performance issues after users report jank, scroll lag, or poor Core Web Vitals, even when the UI “looks fine.” CSS can create beautiful interfaces, but certain properties increase rendering cost and system load in ways that aren’t always obvious during development.
Many sites slow down due to effects like blur filters, complex shadows, and inefficient animations. This guide breaks down which CSS properties typically impact performance most, why they cause slowdowns, and how to optimize them without sacrificing design quality.
Recently, while working on a video streaming interface, I encountered an intriguing performance issue. The application featured video previews with blurred backgrounds generated from thumbnails. While the initial user experience was smooth, a noticeable degradation occurred as users interacted with more videos.
Initial debugging focused on isolating the change that increased rendering cost:
The key signal came from GPU utilization:


The performance change correlated directly with blur rendering cost. Blur intensity (radius) increases per-pixel computation, which can push GPU workload sharply upward when applied to multiple elements or during frequent updates.
This dramatic difference in GPU utilization was solely attributed to the blur effect implementation. The internal computations required for the blur effect, based on the provided radius, heavily utilized the GPU for calculations.
Some CSS properties are consistently expensive because they increase paint/compositing work and per-frame computation:
Filter effects
blur() is demanding due to per-pixel processingComplex shadows
box-shadow with large blur valuesAdvanced operations
We help you speed up your website, improve Core Web Vitals, and deliver smoother user experiences that convert better.
These properties impact performance through measurable resource pressure:
GPU/CPU impact
Memory management
Performance metrics

A common mistake is applying heavy filters like blur() across multiple elements or inside frequently-updated UI states. When filters are applied repeatedly or at scale, rendering cost multiplies quickly and becomes visible as lag during scroll and interaction. Our case study showed how this seemingly innocent choice can lead to significant performance degradation.
Complex shadows become expensive when blur values are high, when multiple shadows stack, or when shadows change during scroll/hover. The cost becomes more noticeable on lower-end devices and on long pages with many cards. This becomes particularly noticeable during scrolling or hover interactions.
Animating layout-affecting properties like width, height, top, or left increases layout and paint work. Prefer compositor-friendly animation properties (typically transform and opacity) to keep motion smooth and reduce main-thread load.
Oversized images increase network cost and can add ongoing rendering overhead when resizing and repainting occurs. Use correctly sized assets, modern formats, and predictable dimensions to keep both loading and rendering efficient.
transform and opacity for animations where possible, since these are typically composited more efficiently than layout-triggering changes. Apply will-change only to elements that truly need it, and remove it when the animation ends to avoid unnecessary memory pressure.We help you speed up your website, improve Core Web Vitals, and deliver smoother user experiences that convert better.
Filters (especially blur()), large/stacked box-shadow, and animations that trigger layout (like width/height) typically have the biggest impact.
filter: blur() so expensive?Blur requires per-pixel computation. Higher blur radii increase the amount of work needed, especially when applied to large areas or many elements.
transform and opacity are generally the safest choices because they can often be composited more efficiently than layout-triggering properties.
will-change be used?Use will-change only for elements that will actually animate, and remove it when the animation ends to avoid unnecessary memory and rendering overhead.
Use browser performance tools to check frame rate, GPU/CPU spikes, and long paint/composite times. Compare behavior with and without effects like filters and heavy shadows.
Not always. Small, simple shadows are usually fine. Performance issues appear when shadows have large blur radii, stack in layers, or animate frequently.
Creating visually polished websites without sacrificing performance requires intentional CSS choices and measured trade-offs. By understanding which properties increase rendering cost and applying targeted optimization strategies, teams can maintain design quality while improving responsiveness and Core Web Vitals.
Remember to:
The goal is consistent: keep experiences smooth, fast, and reliable while still delivering modern UI polish.